Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80QQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 109
54% 85 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 164
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 382A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.1
3% 1.97 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 20 1.3 37 2.5 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 427
Write 348
Mixed 287
SusWrite 48.2
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 11.4
40% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 50.4
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 43
40% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 61%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
216GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 38.9
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 10.6
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 320GB
131GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 37.9
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 10.6
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 58%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
104GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 30.3
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 16.6
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 13% 15 53 41 60 15.5" 1366 768 SDC4A52
History: Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B | Score 8: 1R 1G 0B
Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback