Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory3.5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 65.9
38% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 56
8-Core 60.2
8% 58.1 Pts
64-Core 72.1
4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V3900
HP(103C 0122) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 150 88 70 66 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.2% Above average
Read 236
Write 240
Mixed 226
SusWrite 99.8
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 32.8
106% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 190
142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
4GB free
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,217
Write 26.1
Mixed 54.9
159% 766 MB/s
4K Read 232
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.8
357% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
53GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 65 92 103 76 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 57.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 86.5
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
81% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 0 24" 1280 720 SAM064D SMB2430H
Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback