Asus N56VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus N56VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VM
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '17 at 01:00
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 132
61% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 198
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1477) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2696
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 2% Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 502
Write 348
Mixed 357
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 21.4
98% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 83.7
122% 232 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-068.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VM Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback