Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A314-35

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A314-35  (all builds)
MotherboardJSL Rosemary_JL
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 12:40
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 171
54% 100 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 350
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1510) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8983
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.03 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 900 659 331 328 331 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 867
Write 714
Mixed 810
SusWrite 537
164% 732 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 35.7
118% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 673
507% 685 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 135%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 5% 20 67 53 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO403D
Typical Aspire A314-35 Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A314-35

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback