Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 15:55
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 665
70% 560 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 39.6
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 27.9
28% 35.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 454 455 450 451 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 455
Mixed 359
SusWrite 450
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 49.1
182% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 253
217% 320 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 118%
Great: 113%
Netac OnlyDisk 64GB
52GB free, PID 3701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.6 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Read 19
Write 0.3
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 1.6
8% 7.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 22%
General UDisk 4GB
2GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 9 9 7.5 8.3 8.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.3
9% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5701-049.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 353 295 60 22" 1680 1050 GSM56B5 L224W
Typical GA-Q270M-D3H Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback