Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-895

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-895
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 23:13
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$123
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 777
75% 617 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.8 fps
Splatting 0
0% 0 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 57 60 55 53 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 949
Write 132
Mixed 197
SusWrite 53.8
71% 333 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 36
122% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 162
123% 171 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 185%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 55 52 54 55 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
89GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 23 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 26
SusWrite 24
54% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 103%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 23 23 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.2% Above average
Read 182
Write 151
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 23.7
71% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 537GB
268GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 3 3 3 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
Read 102
Write 40.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 4.9
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 9.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM02FC SAMSUNG
Typical Aspire XC-895 Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback