Today's hottest deals

HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8015
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151207
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 17:20
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 38
2-Core 75.2
37% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 136
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 8015) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 26 74 77 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 85.7
Write 108
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 70.1
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 63%
Kanguru FlashBlu 32GB
27GB free, PID 1106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 14 12 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 21
Write 13
Mixed 13.1
SusWrite 13.4
19% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO10EC
Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback