Medion B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMedion B85M-E45 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 22:16
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 107
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 587
59% 480 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 54.3
49% 59.1 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 51.2
43% 52.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sata3 120GB SSD 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1CB6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 257 302 350 164 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 370
Write 401
Mixed 350
SusWrite 224
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 34.4
129% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 67.9
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 62.7
86% 148 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
64GB free
Firmware: R013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 286 331 252 114 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 517
Write 454
Mixed 423
SusWrite 197
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 31.7
144% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 41.3
99% 203 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
BT58SSD09S 240GB
199GB free
Firmware: 8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 107 28 19 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 499
Write 406
Mixed 321
SusWrite 58.2
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 0.5
51% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 81.2
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
13% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 80%
BT58SSD09S 240GB
131GB free
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 286 330 212 158 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 520
Write 448
Mixed 386
SusWrite 206
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 28.6
130% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 36.9
94% 194 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 80%
Spcc Solid State 256GB
185GB free
Firmware: P1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 240 168 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.7% Good
Read 263
Write 198
Mixed 225
SusWrite 131
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 34.7
132% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 73.8
82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050A7 500GB
249GB free
Firmware: A3E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 93 93 94 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 93
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 90.1
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 72.3" 1280 701 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR
Typical B85M-E45 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Medion B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $505
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback