Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 19:51
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 81
2-Core 194
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 462
53% 415 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 51 120 159 141 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 177
Write 178
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 125
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 103%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
180GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 21.6
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 24.5
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB-$21
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 32768 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 18.5" 1280 720 SAM0598 SyncMaster
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback