| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | HP 2000 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 169A |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120816 |
| Uptime | 17.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 02 '21 at 03:29 |
| Run Duration | 310 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 74% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
25.4%
Poor
|
20% 23.3 Pts
|
4% 26.5 Pts
|
2% 28.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 169A) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
|
0.89%
Terrible
|
1% 1.37 fps
|
1% 1.23 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 27 32 33 11 17 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
24% 33 MB/s
|
51% 0.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.4%
Very poor
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
7% 2.43 GB/s
|
23% 173 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 10% | 21 | 3 | 0 | 75 | 17" | 1152 864 | DELD05B DELL E1713S |
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B
Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 631 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 2000 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 129x |
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 84x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 210x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 92x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $95 |