Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '17 at 20:35
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 559
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 93.5
47% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 161
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 50
Write 48
Mixed 45.3
36% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.3
85% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
51GB free
Firmware: 15.0
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 94.4
Mixed 94.7
70% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.27
91% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback