Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc7900 Ultra-Slim Desktop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq dc7900 Ultra-Slim Desktop  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3033h
Memory2.1 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 23:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$40
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 70.4
35% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 69.5
8-Core 70.9
9% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 71
4% 71 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3036)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2413
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.57 fps
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BEKT-66F3T2 80GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 32 30 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 62.6
Write 64.2
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 40.3
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 45%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
128GB free
Firmware: JE4OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 60
Write 56.8
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 45.5
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7900 Ultra-Slim Desktop Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7900 Ultra-Slim Desktop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback