Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive546% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '17 at 22:30
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 120
52% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 12.7
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 9.37
Splatting 8.83
7% 8.35 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
546% Outstanding
Read 4,190
Write 4,514
Mixed 4,364
976% 4,356 MB/s
4K Read 120
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 69.2
325% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 72.7
72% 117 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 546%
Great: 546%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback