Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4236DJ7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4236DJ7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4236DJ7
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 21:16
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 70
1-Core 33.9
2-Core 23.5
34% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 37.3
8-Core 46.4
5% 41.8 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 145 129 131 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 114
Write 137
Mixed 117
SusWrite 135
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 10.5
26% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 4 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A0
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback