Today's hottest deals

ACER Aspire X1900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemACER Aspire X1900  (all builds)
MotherboardACER Aspire X1900
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime16.3 Days
Run DateAug 03 '17 at 03:52
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 82.5
41% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 84.6
8-Core 81.9
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 86.5
5% 86.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 1733) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 7.97
5% 7.25 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 73.9
Write 91.3
Mixed 28.4
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.15
76% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
WD WD6400AAKS-22A7B2 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: DCCOC54P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 43.7
Mixed 5.91
23% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.32
71% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD63I1B1624EU 04CB AD63I1A0823EU 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1900 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire X1900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback