Today's hottest deals

Cisco UCSC-C240-M4S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCisco UCSC-C240-M4S  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C240-M4S
Memory137 GB free of 144 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 169
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 657
55% 478 Pts
64-Core 2,525
156% 2,525 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cisco UCSC-MRAID12G 1TB
966GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 15 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
209% Outstanding
Read 712
Write 16.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 16.5
139% 194 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
526% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 209%
Great: 209%
Cisco UCSC-MRAID12G 3.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 143 99 95 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
212% Outstanding
Read 618
Write 184
Mixed 108
SusWrite 118
187% 257 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.9
517% 3.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393A4K40CB1-CRC 0xCE00 M393A4K40CB1-CRC 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB1-CRC 0xCE00 M393A4K40CB1-CRC 0xCE00 M393A4K40CB1-CRC 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB1-CRC 143GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 32767, 8192, 32767, 32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 24.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 4% 68 18 11 0 0" 1920 1080
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 11: 1R 2G 0B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback