Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 23:04
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 89.8
53% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 288
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 334.89
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 9.4
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 0.3
7% 9.17 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate STM3250318AS 250GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 33 25 26 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 43.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 27.4
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 7.1 7 7.6 9 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 8.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.3
16% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.6
188% 3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 9905403-038.A00G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback