Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 22:28
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 884
79% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,145
71% 1,145 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.57
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 36.7
32% 39.4 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 38.8
34% 42 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9341-8i 512GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 433 415 416 409 336 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 294
Write 409
Mixed 340
SusWrite 408
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 33.4
114% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 279
209% 278 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 102%
Avago MR9341-8i 1TB
898GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 196 197 197 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 74.2
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 197
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.5 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 10
Mixed 12
SusWrite 2.4
13% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 45.8
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 93 7 60 42.5" 2194 1234 DELD084 DELL P4317Q
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback