ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion GM441AA-ABA m8125x

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Hp-pavilion GM441AA-ABA m8125x (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Basswood3G
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070608
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '15 at 12:34
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 29.8 2-Core 59.5 20% 44.7 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 118 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3530) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4174 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.74 1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55 8,365 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 158198368 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2181 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 213871247 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11417 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2171 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 253 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 49 404095000 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 77 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 533621 (C2) HDA temperature 24 51 51539607576 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 22 158198368 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 197 22 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	48.3% Average	Read 93.5 Write 75.1 Mixed 75.9 61% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 63%
Samsun HD753LJ 750GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 61GB free Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 76 76 7990 (04) Start/Stop count 76 76 24468 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19445 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 8864 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 52 353697813 (C2) HDA temperature 78 51 370409494 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 133081 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 8 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	39.2% Below average	Read 80.2 Write 56.2 Mixed 72.8 53% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.38 99% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 58%
WD WD5000AAKS-00YGA 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 61GB free Firmware: 12.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 36 5916 (04) Start/Stop count 76 76 24881 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 26243 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 11133 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 180 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 24881 (C2) HDA temperature 124 90 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 16 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	26.6% Poor	Read 42.3 Write 50.1 Mixed 60.4 39% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.3 86% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 39%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB 872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 27GB free Firmware: 3.CH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 69 69 31791 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 469995261 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 26354 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 11172 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 36 488243229 (C2) HDA temperature 29 64 85899345949 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 69 53 66142971 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	32.6% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 58.5 Mixed 58 43% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.44 106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GM441AA-ABA m8125x Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion GM441AA-ABA m8125x

CPU
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	1x

SSD
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $157

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback