Toshiba Satellite M55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite M55  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ECU00
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 21:54
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.86GHz-$49
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 57.5
1-Core 18
2-Core 17.7
25% 31.1 Pts
4-Core 17.1
8-Core 17.4
2% 17.2 Pts
64-Core 17.3
1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2100AH 100GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00400097
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 36 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 16.3
Write 31.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 34.6
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.53% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1
5% 1.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback