Asus P5Q-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-EM  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '17 at 20:37
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 97.1
46% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 69.8
42% 52.1 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 43.1
35% 42.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RAID0 640GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 192
Mixed 168
134% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 4.11
4K Mixed 0.67
176% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-EM Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback