Today's hottest deals

Positivo VJFE42F11X-B0362H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPositivo VJFE42F11X-B0362H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-CL
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 128
55% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 281
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D256 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 517 237 211 226 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 929
Write 506
Mixed 330
SusWrite 295
114% 515 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 8.2
70% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 240
218% 340 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 170%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 6.2 6.6 8.7 7 7.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 20.4
Write 9.5
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 6.4
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.4
226% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE160SO102408-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 14" 1280 701 BOE07F6
Typical VJFE42F11X-B0362H Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE42F11X-B0362H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback