Asus UN65U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus UN65U  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UN65U
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190422
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 162
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 149
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8744) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
788GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 793 618 657 794 307 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 880
Write 1,076
Mixed 915
SusWrite 560
194% 858 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57.3
182% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 411
300% 396 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 144%
Great: 305%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
900GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 101 103 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 100
Mixed 39
SusWrite 102
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58%
Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 16GB
12GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.1 2.2 1.4 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 2
4% 2.72 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 13.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 34" 1280 720 PHL093D PHL 345B1C
Typical UN65U Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UN65U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback