ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus N752VX

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus N752VX (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N752VX
Memory	19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 18:12
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 103 2-Core 196 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 123 38% 240 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10A0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 6.62 6% 8.39 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 14.1 8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31 9,202 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,895 Write 903 Mixed 1,249 297% 1,349 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 98.1 4K Mixed 38.6 142% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 98.2 132% 241 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 243%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 142 142 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1284 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1033 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1284 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5324 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 188979216425 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	69.1% Good	Read 122 Write 119 Mixed 115 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.19 74% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 24GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.2% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.1 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.2 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical N752VX Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N752VX

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	239x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	9x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	179x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	69x

SSD
NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 201%, 5,877 samples	25x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	23x
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	19x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	42x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	25x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 24GBHynixBench 59%, 66 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback