Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 02:33
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 889
92% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 137
Parallax 128
103% 131 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,674
Write 2,402
Mixed 1661
430% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 83.8
282% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,279
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 407
446% 768 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 267%
SSD 480GB
53GB free
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 290 385 388 389 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 466
Mixed 392
SusWrite 384
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 42
154% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 202
193% 301 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 107%
Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
114GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 492 485 410 394 390 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 492
Mixed 405
SusWrite 443
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 50.8
183% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 363
276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
HFS256G32TNF-N2A2A 256GB
100GB free
Firmware: 70060P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 238 232 233 233 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 473
Mixed 429
SusWrite 267
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 46.8
166% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 328
255% 348 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
SSD 1TB
207GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 441 441 406 99 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 392
Mixed 354
SusWrite 322
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 37.3
149% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 199
175% 259 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 19.8
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 9.3
23% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 7% 27 110 7 144 31.5" 2560 1440 AOC3201 Q32G1WG4
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback