Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus P8B WS  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 04:31
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 366
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1139) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 31.5
28% 34.7 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 29.5
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 64 72 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 482
Write 430
Mixed 342
SusWrite 99.4
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 164
167% 267 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70%
Great: 83%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
202GB free
Firmware: 1AC01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 73 74 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 67.8
Write 45.6
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 72.6
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
298GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 79 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 77.3
Write 43.3
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 77.4
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
153GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 120 122 123 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 121
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 86F1 i-DIMM 86F1 i-DIMM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 180 31.5" 1280 720 VIE0875 DP
Typical P8B WS Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8B WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback