MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 01:07
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 824
86% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
EVGA(3842 2163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 95.7
Reflection 96
Parallax 87.8
78% 93.2 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 85.8
79% 98.7 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,346
Write 1,022
Mixed 1,047
253% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 82.7
279% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 845
640% 866 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
43GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 152 155 155 154 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 149
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 150
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST3000DM008-2DT166 1 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MMAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 147
Mixed 87
SusWrite 155
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U0836181B CL18-20-20 D4-3600 D4U0836181B CL18-20-20 D4-3600 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 31.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 9R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 16% 125 316 246 120 29.5" 2560 1080 SPT0BCC Sceptre P30
History: Score 41: 5R 3G 7B | Score 60: 9R 2G 9B
Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback