Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 13:11
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 138
57% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 252
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 69
Parallax 69.9
32% 59.5 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 27.7
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 68 39 58 47 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 307
Write 263
Mixed 223
SusWrite 74.1
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 5.6
31% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 91.5
109% 191 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 82%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
659GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 56 61 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 15.1
Write 37.7
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 59.6
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 5R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 24% 74 282 205 144 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback