Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 14:33
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$212
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 835
87% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,112
75% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 134
Parallax 306
117% 195 fps
MRender 229
Gravity 143
Splatting 170
126% 181 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 125%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,533
Write 1,563
Mixed 1,204
320% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 75.9
261% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 991
766% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 237%
Jmicron Tech 960GB
191GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 305 308 313 197 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 374
Write 293
Mixed 273
SusWrite 254
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 24.6
83% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 148
124% 182 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 84%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
168GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1166 1174 1169 1171 1175 1159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
46GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 112 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 77
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 112
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55%
Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
481GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 152 150 150 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 145
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 151
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
362% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 94%
Generic USB2.0-CRW-Combo 64GB
19GB free, PID 0150
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 23 28 18 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 38
Write 15.9
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 23.7
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3
208% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.1
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 15: 1R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 62% 8 245 64 60 32" 1920 1080 SPT15B9 U55
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 76,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback