Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NC683AA-ABA m9500y (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Aspen
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090507
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9750 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 62 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 70.8 37% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 139 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO-512 611 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 34C1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 1.6 3% 5.53 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 4 4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9750420AS 750GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 654GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001SDM5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 97 74 103 92 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 91.5 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Phenom 9950AMDBench 46%, 2,150 samples	1x
Phenom 9750AMDBench 44%, 1,906 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600 GSO-512NvidiaBench 3%, 611 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GSNvidiaBench 2%, 1,408 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x