Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 39.6 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 86.8 34% 57.7 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 178 25% 183 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1DE0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 287 288 291 313 321 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	67% Good	Read 327 Write 306 Mixed 293 SusWrite 296 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 27.5 87% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 176 136% 186 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	33	7	4	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO38ED

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	169x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	28x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	160x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	22x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	8x

SSD
Micron_1300_MTFDDAK256TDL 256GBBench 69%, 220 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
RBUSC180DS37128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 55%, 109 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16