Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TYR0X
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 5800X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 329
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,254
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 2,327
144% 2,327 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Dell(1028 C756) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 129
Reflection 117
Parallax 145
106% 130 fps
Gravity 117
Splatting 107
98% 112 fps
Poor: 90% Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 23000020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2391 1656 506 678 475 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,650
Write 2,393
Mixed 1,536
SusWrite 1,031
425% 1,902 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 71.4
234% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 1,013
722% 917 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 280%
Great: 321%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB
300GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 453 463 464 458 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 469
Mixed 444
SusWrite 436
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 38.3
132% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 189
162% 230 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid CT250MX50 250GB
168GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 435 445 445 445 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 445
Mixed 432
SusWrite 438
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 27.1
102% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 144
136% 202 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid ST2000DM008-2FR1 2TB
987GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 180 182 182 181 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 123
Write 151
Mixed 67
SusWrite 179
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 124%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
787GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 36
Write 36
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 37.8
47% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 100%
WD My Passport 0820 1.5TB
656GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 35.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 36
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X2YH1K-MIE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 68.7
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 33.4
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 31.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 4R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 13% 54 300 269 60 23.5" 1920 1080 GSM5A4F 24M35
History: Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 27: 4R 2G 1B
Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback