Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8062
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 15:34
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$37
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 201
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 308
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8062) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7757
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.8
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 205 243 251 230 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 456
Write 238
Mixed 214
SusWrite 221
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 22.3
77% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 23.4
59% 124 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP326E HP E242
Typical ProDesk 400 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback