Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '17 at 00:48
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 315
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2761) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 51.5
34% 40.9 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 36.3
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 233
Write 105
Mixed 152
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 13.5
60% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 67.2
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 19.6
34% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 73%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
81GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 69.5
Write 71.4
Mixed 33.5
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.24
58% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 53%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
60GB free
Firmware: GM3OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 58
Mixed 24.1
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.32
88% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-199.A00LF 9905403-199.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback