Today's hottest deals

Samsung 370E4K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 370E4K  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP370E4K-KWBBR
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 03:13
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3205U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 94.3
46% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 94.7
13% 94.4 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.3
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 90
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 370E4K Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 370E4K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback