MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 10:50
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 872
92% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 91
55% 74.7 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 48.8
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,581
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,543
481% 2,164 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 92.9
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 918
697% 942 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 447 447 446 447 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 442
Mixed 445
SusWrite 422
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 47.4
156% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 126%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
135GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 354 354 354 355 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 373
Write 350
Mixed 330
SusWrite 354
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 25
113% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 33.3
67% 134 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 92%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 550GB
174GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.1 1.3 2.3 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 3
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 2.1
4% 5.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 35.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 24.5" 1280 720 LEN2450 Y25f
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback