Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81E5
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 32.9
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 54.5
22% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 103
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 98.5
6% 98.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 81E5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 78 87 70 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 211
Write 124
Mixed 162
SusWrite 80.5
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 23.9
77% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 99
73% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 73%
BHT WR202HH032G E70290F5 31GB
5GB free
Firmware: 90014a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 153
Write 128
Mixed 125
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 5.9
34% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 9.4
9% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback