Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 138
52% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 210
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 11.5
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 167 155 164 166 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 347
Write 240
Mixed 258
SusWrite 159
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 31.4
119% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 147
132% 199 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 91%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 34TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 34 34 37 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
Read 145
Write 9.4
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 32.6
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
166% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback