Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 09:42
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 766
66% 565 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2242 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 167
Parallax 104
88% 126 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 102
Splatting 100
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 318 233 137 163 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 562
Mixed 616
SusWrite 218
150% 683 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 34.5
173% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 358
299% 425 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 138%
Great: 173%
Q-360 360GB
132GB free
Firmware: 60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 354 350 347 350 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 362
Mixed 352
SusWrite 326
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 39.2
150% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 166
139% 197 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 9.7 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 10.2
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 9.6
15% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
25% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback