Today's hottest deals

Asus P5G41-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5G41-M LX  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090803
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 16:38
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 75.3
43% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 66.5
8-Core 67.1
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 75.3
5% 75.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 171 178 175 182 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 201
Write 193
Mixed 184
SusWrite 174
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 29.8
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 73.7
DQ Mixed 41.7
35% 49 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
437GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 82 80 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 85.1
Write 84.6
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 80.7
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41-M LX Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback