Today's hottest deals

Asus M70AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M70AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M70AD
Memory5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 15:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 181
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 278
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Gigabyte(1458 3518) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 0.6
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.9
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 155 150 151 165 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 146
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 146
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 88%
Hitachi Touro Mobile 3.0 500GB
329GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 9.7
Write 39.1
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 39.4
19% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G 0112 78.C1GET.CP10C 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M70AD Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M70AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback