Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 00:21
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 156
2-Core 307
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,160
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 2,810
174% 2,810 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 123
Parallax 145
114% 136 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 108
Splatting 91.8
92% 116 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 832 836 796 632 491 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,713
Mixed 1,346
SusWrite 820
307% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 62.2
207% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 623
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 513
367% 478 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 198%
Great: 276%
Seagate Expansion Desk 14TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 41.1
Write 38.9
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 41.7
9% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.3
25% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 7.5
DQ Write 8.2
DQ Mixed 1.8
3% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 27.6
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 14.2
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.8
279% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.1
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 14.2
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
209% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 30
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 14.3
21% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
238% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
533GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 164 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 154
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 162
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 38.9
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 36.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback