Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 155
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 407
37% 311 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 66
Parallax 62
53% 64.2 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 62.7
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 86 94 86 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 328
Write 122
Mixed 167
SusWrite 88.8
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 25.6
100% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 117
88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 81%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
171GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 425 302 231 244 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 289
Write 374
Mixed 339
SusWrite 310
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 36.9
118% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 318
238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
322GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 426 444 448 443 440 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 345
Mixed 322
SusWrite 440
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 40.9
130% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.3
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 359
220% 234 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB
289GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 34.2
24% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback