HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '17 at 18:37
Run Duration503 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 54
2-Core 80.8
32% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 81.1
8-Core 78.2
11% 79.6 Pts
64-Core 82
5% 82 Pts
Poor: 23% Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 2.22
2% 3.01 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.26
3% 3.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 103
Write 108
Mixed 99.5
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%
Maxtor S TM3750330AS 750GB
101GB free
Firmware: MX15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 73.2
Write 69.8
Mixed 36.2
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.38
100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
14GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 87.1
Mixed 80.9
105% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 2.89
Mixed 3.69
7% 7.62 MB/s
4K Read 1.99
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.003
8% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
K 9 S M 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 13% Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback