Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc7700 Convertible Minitower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq dc7700 Convertible Minitower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A58h
Memory5.9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 12:10
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Memory 20.9
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 40.4
17% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 50.7
8-Core 36.8
6% 43.8 Pts
64-Core 43.6
3% 43.6 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 74 74 74 74 75 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 207
Write 201
Mixed 189
SusWrite 72.9
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 28.1
92% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 38.2
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 49.1
39% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 130%
Maxtor STM380811AS 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 70
Write 35.8
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 69.8
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
281GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 71.8
Write 53.1
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 72.7
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 314
13% 314 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7700 Convertible Minitower Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7700 Convertible Minitower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback