Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2-B3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 08:26
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 459
52% 406 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Gigabyte(1458 2557) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 5.6
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 42 98 50 114 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 110
Write 71
Mixed 60
SusWrite 84.7
18% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 9.6
37% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 8.7
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 11.4
9% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
106GB free
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 91.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 104
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2-B3 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback