Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Z5100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire Z5100  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WMCP78M
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1190 x 676 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110607
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 04:27
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 87.2
43% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 174
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 16
Parallax 19.7
16% 18.3 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 0.3
9% 12.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 11 16 9.4 18 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 87.2
Write 81.9
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 17.4
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HUS724020ALA640 2TB
250GB free
Firmware: MF6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 65 75 68 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 128
Write 110
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 68.5
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
140GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 73 78 77 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 94.5
Write 69.3
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 75.6
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 70%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 124GB
1GB free, PID 7722
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32.1
Mixed 11.8
20% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 26%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$11
18GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32.9
Mixed 11.9
20% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
136% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GLLTU160N02 SP008GLLTU160N02 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z5100 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire Z5100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback