Today's hottest deals

MSI KA780GM (MS-7552)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7552
MotherboardMSI KA780GM (MS-7552)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 23:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 73.7
42% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 74.6
8-Core 75.1
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 74.8
5% 74.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Zotac(19DA 3025) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 306.97
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 0.9
1% 2.5 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 149 164 75 136 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 185
Write 175
Mixed 160
SusWrite 129
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 28.4
96% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 34.3
29% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$53
112GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 52 60 59 54 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 67.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 57.9
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KA780GM (MS-7552) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI KA780GM (MS-7552)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback