HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AF
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 01:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 259
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 704
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 87AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.3% Good
Lighting 74
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 73.5
60% 78.4 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 68.7
63% 78.9 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 615 600 629 638 644 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Crucial M4 128GB mSATA-$169
119GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 194 180 186 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 467
Write 186
Mixed 230
SusWrite 190
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 14.4
89% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 29
76% 163 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 30.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 27
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback