Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 00:05
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 928
92% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 869D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3757 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 102
Parallax 112
90% 108 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 91.2
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$27
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,645
Write 1,112
Mixed 1,030
279% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 49.3
234% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 548
510% 777 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 228%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
718GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2653 2626 1484 261 197 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,176
Write 2,696
Mixed 1,788
SusWrite 1,246
393% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 77.2
277% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,380
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 1,197
881% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 260%
Great: 328%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
791GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 35.6
Write 36
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 38.9
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 66%
External USB 3.0 1TB
491GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 181 182 178 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 153
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 180
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
470GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 173 173 172 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 139
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 172
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 33.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback